As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Brother MFC-L2710DW vs Brother MFC-L2750DW Review: Pros and Cons

For someone who needs a versatile, all-in-one, printer machine that prints well and runs reasonably fast, both Brother MFC-L2710DW and MFC-L2750DW would definitely make decent picks. Both can print, scan, copy, and fax, but which one would make a better choice? Check the comparisons of Brother MFC-L2710DW vs Brother MFC-L2750DW below to find out.

Brother MFC-L2710DW Reviews


At 15.7 x 16.1 x 12.5” dimensions and 26 pounds weight, the Brother MFC-L2710DW is a compact and space-saving device. It hasn’t yet been furnished with a color touchscreen LCD so it might look a bit more dated than its competitors. Overall, it has the signature solid black appearance from Brother’s laser printer lines.


The tray of Brother MFC-L2710DW can support 250 sheets of paper at once, as well as one slot for the envelope, labels, and other media. The monthly duty cycle rates at a maximum of 15,000 pages which is the standard for monochrome laser printers from the manufacturer.

The device might not support all types of connectivity, but it does support most of them. The basic connectivity such as USB connects, Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct, and Ethernet are available for you to use. The mobile connectivity is pretty complete from Google Cloud Print and Apple AirPrint, as well as the Brother’s own app which is the iPrint&Scan. The last specific application lets you connect to different cloud sites and print emails from them.

The printing speed of Brother MFC-L2710DW vs Brother MFC-L2750DW is almost no different at 36 ppm. It is still faster than the rivals in its class. The graphic and photo prints come out pretty vibrant even though a monochrome laser printer is rarely the first choice for this kind of usage.

>> See the latest pricing for Brother MFC-L2710DW on Amazon <<

Brother MFC-L2710DW Pros and Cons

  • Above-average printing quality for text
  • Well-connected features for different devices
  • No LCD display color touchscreen

Brother MFC-L2750DW Reviews


The MFC-L2750DW measures 15.7 x 16.1 x 12.5”, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It is definitely lighter and smaller side so compared to other laser printer models; the space-saving device will sit more comfortably with your desktop. At the top part, there is a 2.7” Touch to Connect screen, to make printing and scanning activities more convenient for you.


The MFC-L2750DW is equipped with high-yield and super high-yield toners – the printer comes with extra toner that could last about 7,500 prints or 2 years of average usage. It can handle up to 250 sheets of paper input in the tray. The maximum duty cycle of the device is 15,000 pages per month.

The printer is very well-connected, as it is one aspect that the Brother manufacturer never skimps about. The connectivity features range satisfyingly. It covers pretty much all the methods possible. You can print via USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Wi-Fi Direct, mobile connectivity such as Google Cloud Print, iOS AirPrint, Brother’s iPrint&Scan app, and the most excellently near field communication (NFC).

This device’s printing capabilities rates 36 ppm (pages per minute). The overall output quality level is above average. The text is printed neatly even on really small size fonts.

The graphic and photo prints are passable and highly legible – enough for home, office, or school handouts but probably won’t be enough to impress for marketing materials. However, the scanning aspect, especially for color, runs pretty slow.

>> See the latest pricing for Brother MFC-L2750DW on Amazon <<

Brother MFC-L2750DW Pros and Cons

  • Extra toners for longer printing usage
  • LCD touchscreen display
  • Higher print speed
  • Lower color-scanning speed

Which is Better, Brother MFC-L2710DW or MFC-L2750DW?

Both monochrome laser printer models above have similar designs and feature comparably. Both would make a solid choice for personal, house, or home-based office usage. From the laid-out Brother MFC-L2710DW vs Brother MFC-L2750DW comparison, however, we can see that the latter is slightly more superior to the earlier.

Leave a Comment